z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of near horizontal heterophoria tests in free space and with phoropter
Author(s) -
Katarzyna Perz-Juszczyszyn,
Monika Feltzke,
Katarzyna Dubas,
Willis Clem Maples,
Barbara Kołodziejczak,
Hanna Buczkowska
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
optica applicata
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.204
H-Index - 28
eISSN - 1899-7015
pISSN - 0078-5466
DOI - 10.37190/oa210204
Subject(s) - heterophoria , free space , mathematics , base (topology) , optics , medicine , ophthalmology , optometry , strabismus , physics , mathematical analysis
Background: Measurements of phoria at near are important elements of the optometric assessment of binocular vision. It is important to know if different methods of measuring a phoria are interchangeable. This study was designed to compare phoria measures using in-phoropter (von Graefe) and in free space methods (Howell card). Methods: The study was conducted with 70 pre-presbyopic subjects, aged 23–35 years. Both near the von Graefe and near Howell card horizontal dissociated phorias along and with gradient +1.00 D and –1.00 D phorias were measured for each technique. Results: The mean values of the near dissociated phoria, for both test conditions (von Graefe and Howell card) showed a slight deviation in the two measures with von Graefe measures being generally more exophoric. The mean value of the phoropter phoria was 1.97 ∆ base-in and in free space, the value was 0.9 ∆ base-in. The phoropter phoria with the +1.00 D gradient was 5.24 ∆ base-in, and in free space, 2.73 ∆ base-in. Measurements of the phorometric phoria with a gradient of –1.00 D gave a mean of 0.42 ∆ base-out and 0.94 ∆ base-out in free space. The near phoria measures were significantly different for the basic near measure ( p = 0.01) and for the +1.00 D gradient ( p = 0.2) but not for the –1.00 D measure ( p = 0.36). Conclusion: The results of the differences in the near horizontal phoria in free space and in- phoropter were significantly different for the basic measure and for the +1.00 D gradient. The findings between the two methods of testing should therefore not be treated as equivalent or convertible. Each test method should have separate means and ranges established.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here