Open AccessThe Auditing Process Reform in the Jordanian Bureaucracy
Author(s) -
Rami Tbaishat
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
academic journal of interdisciplinary studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.148
H-Index - 5
eISSN - 2281-3993
pISSN - 2281-4612
DOI - 10.36941/ajis-2021-0039
Subject(s) - transparency (behavior) , audit , bureaucracy , government (linguistics) , process (computing) , strengths and weaknesses , corporate governance , accounting , business , politics , public relations , engineering , political science , process management , computer science , law , finance , psychology , social psychology , linguistics , philosophy , operating system
The aim of the research is to systematically conduct a methodical analysis of policy reforms in Jordan and study the perceptions and features of such a reform. The primary purpose of this review study will be to concentrate on the auditing issues within the system for developing policies and guidelines and to identify possible weaknesses and deficiencies. The investigation of this study used the diagnostic-analytical analysis of the auditing system in the political process to recognize the underlying flaws and weaknesses. In this analysis process, pattern matching is a well-known technique in this type of study, where a certain type of outcome may be known in several cases and the study concentrates on how and why these results occur in each case. The study found that the degree of authority assigned to both the government and its regulatory structure is clearly the main variable that can impede and encourage successful standards of transparency and responsiveness. Jordan's latest endeavor to reach agreement on the role, functions and power of the government has opened the door to the quarrels that endanger the regime's stability. This research will also take into account the environmental conditions under which the governance structure functions effectively and how Jordan can channel its efforts towards achieving productivity in the public service, with particular emphasis on the auditing process.
Received: 11 November 2020 / Accepted: 07 January 2021 / Published: 5 March 2021