
Comparative Assessment of Environment-Friendly Alternative to R134a in Vapour Compression Refrigeration System using Exergy Destruction
Author(s) -
Sudhanshu Sharma,
Vijay Kumar Dwivedi
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
maǧallaẗ al-abḥāṯ al-handasiyyaẗ
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2307-1885
pISSN - 2307-1877
DOI - 10.36909/jer.icmet.17205
Subject(s) - refrigerant , refrigeration , exergy , coefficient of performance , gas compressor , vapor compression refrigeration , thermodynamics , environmental science , carnot cycle , exergy efficiency , compression (physics) , process engineering , engineering , physics
The goal of this research is to compare the performance of a vapour compression refrigeration system using R-600a to a similar system having R-134a as a refrigerant. Both refrigerants have no potential to deplete the ozone layer. However, because R-134a is an HCF, its global warming potential is rather strong, whereas R-600a's is nearly none. The two refrigerants' desirable properties are compared. R-600a is a better refrigerant for a vapour compression refrigeration system, according to this comparison. The average values of the required parameters are then presented once a number of trials have been completed. To compare the refrigerants, the coefficient of performance, refrigeration effect, Carnot COP, and second law efficiency were calculated. The findings show that R-600a is a superior refrigerant. The system's primary components' exergy destruction has also been calculated. It demonstrates that the compressor has depleted its maximal exergy. R-600a is a strong alternative to R-134a, which is currently utilized in household refrigerators, according to the analysis.