Globalization and standards of constitutional interpretation

The article examines the problems of constitutional interpretation through the prism of globalization and modern world modelsof constitutional interpretation. Emphasis is placed on the fact that the main trend in the implementation of constitutional interpretationin modern conditions is the use of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and reference to the decisions of the constitutionalcourts of foreign countries. This is the result of globalization, the practice of modern constitutionalism and dialogue betweenjudges of constitutional courts in the world. Such a constitutional combination of practices is not only a tool for improving judicial decisions,but also for building a “global legal system”. The globalization of constitutional law means that constitutionalism is no longerthe privilege of the nation-state, but a world concept and standard. The use of international law in the constitutional interpretation isjust one example of the migration of constitutional ideas through legal systems, which also includes the use of foreign constitutions asmodels in the process of adopting a constitution.It is concluded that Ukraine, like the countries of Eastern and Central Europe, has no choice but to adopt liberal-democratic constitutions.These are common constitutional values and constitutional rapprochement. Therefore, the constitutional interpretationthrough a comparative reference to international (and foreign) law and soft law acts of the Council of Europe is part of the modernimplementation of the concept of international law, the concept of friendly attitude to international law and the migration of constitutionalideas.