Open AccessHIGH-DOSE SUBLINGUAL ALLERGEN IMMUNOTHERAPY: ADVISABILITY AND SAFETY
Author(s) -
О М Курбачева,
К С Павлова
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
rossijskij allergologičeskij žurnal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2686-682X
pISSN - 1810-8830
DOI - 10.36691/rja529
Subject(s) - slit , sublingual immunotherapy , medicine , allergen , safety profile , adverse effect , sublingual administration , asthma , allergen immunotherapy , allergy , immunotherapy , immunology , dermatology , intensive care medicine , immune system , genetics , biology
Efficacy of the allergen immunotherapy (ait) in the treatment of allergic rhinitis and asthma has been proved in many studies and systematic reviews. Higher safety profile of sublingual ait (slit) relative subcutaneous ait (sCit) defines preferences of slit. although the results of the first study of slit were published about 25 years ago and a lot of allergenic products for slit appeared during this period, poor evidence base and a lack of direct comparative controlled studies on the efficacy of slit vs sCit support debate about what way of allergen administration is more effective. it is possible, that lower efficacy of slit showed in earlier studies explains for the use of regimes with low daily and cours doses of allergens. in a recent review of the eaaCi it was shown the dosedependent therapeutic effect of ait, and was noted that an increase of the maintenance allergen dose while sCit increases the risk of adverse events, vs high doses slit demonstrates good safety profile with a significant increase of efficacy. it is possible that future studies using high doses of standardized allergens for slit will show not only more high profile of slit safety, but also its higher efficacy vs sCit.