z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The "Scourge" of Armed Check Fraud: A Constitutional Framework for Prohibited Possessor Laws
Author(s) -
Jeffrey Giancana
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
university of michigan journal of law reform
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2688-4933
pISSN - 0363-602X
DOI - 10.36646/mjlr.51.2.scourge
Subject(s) - constitutionality , law , supreme court , jurisprudence , statute , possession (linguistics) , political science , constitution , constitutional law , linguistics , philosophy
Prohibited possessor statutes have been a part of American law for decades. Put simply, these laws prohibit any person who has been convicted of a felony from possessing a firearm, a prohibition that lasts for the felon’s entire life. The Supreme Court’s modern Second Amendment jurisprudence has held that the right to possess a firearm is a fundamental individual right. In light of this new paradigm, the constitutionality of such broad prohibitions must be called into question—despite the eagerness of courts across the country to dismiss such challenges by pointing to a single line in Heller. This Note challenges the constitutionality of modern prohibited possessor laws and asserts that these laws are unconstitutionally overbroad. It then proposes a constitutional framework for analyzing laws that ban firearm possession by felons.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here