Open AccessToo Many Cooks in the Climate Change Kitchen: The Case for an Administrative Remedy for Damages Caused by Increased Greenhouse Gas Concentrations
Author(s) -
Benjamin Reese
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
michigan journal of environmental and administrative law/michigan journal of environmental and administration law
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2375-6284
pISSN - 2375-6276
DOI - 10.36640/mjeal.4.2.many
Subject(s) - damages , tort , greenhouse gas , climate change , compensation (psychology) , state (computer science) , law , face (sociological concept) , federal court , business , natural resource economics , political science , economics , sociology , supreme court , liability , computer science , psychology , ecology , social science , algorithm , psychoanalysis , biology
Recent federal and state court decisions have made clear that federal common law claims against emitters of greenhouse gases are not sustainable; however, those same courts seem to have given state common law tort claims the green light, at least if the claims are brought in the state where the polluters are located. This Note contends that such suits are not an adequate remedy for those injured by climate change because they will face nearly insurmountable barriers in state court, and because there are major policy-level drawbacks to relying on state tort law rather than a federal solution. This Note then proposes a federal regulatory system of climate change compensation and explains several reasons why it is a preferable means of compensating climate change’s victims.