z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Rematerialization, Art, and Affective Economies
Author(s) -
Azza Zein
Publication year - 2019
Language(s) - English
DOI - 10.36583/2019050210
Subject(s) - invisibility , aesthetics , value (mathematics) , sociology , abstraction , hegemony , space (punctuation) , relation (database) , process (computing) , epistemology , art , political science , linguistics , politics , philosophy , law , computer science , database , machine learning , artificial intelligence , operating system
The paper highlights artworks that engage with materials to comment on the dematerialization of the economy and the invisibility of labour. The emphasis is on artworks which disturb these conditions through a process of rematerialization, defined as “attending to materials.” How to revalue what has been dematerialized, devalued, or deemed invisible? To revalue invisible labour is to find a material that can engage with the affective relation surrounding labour and space, a material that can experience the invisibility rather than represent it. By correspondences of materials, actions and the body, the artworks counter abstraction and standardized value. One can identify across diverse contemporary artworks parallel forms of rematerialization through tasks. Tasks are free from the hegemony in the binary of work vs. leisure and productive notions of land and labour. The geographically dispersed artistic examples present a possible process of revaluation rather than mere critique of value. These examples are compared against twentieth century artworks considered critique of standardized value. With the help of affect theories, the paper argues that such rematerialization through care and attention may offer a “reparative” process that posits an alternative to exposing economic structures.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here