z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Differences in Days Assigned to Exclusionary Discipline Consequences as a Function of Student Poverty for Texas Middle School Students
Author(s) -
John W. White,
John R. Slate
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
cross-currents
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2394-451X
DOI - 10.36344/ccijhss.2017.v03i02.004
Subject(s) - disadvantaged , suspension (topology) , poverty , psychology , mathematics education , statistical analysis , grade retention , demography , mathematics , academic achievement , sociology , economic growth , statistics , economics , homotopy , pure mathematics
Examined in this study were the number of days assigned to in-school suspension and to out-of-school suspension to Grade 6, 7, and 8 students based on their economic status in Texas for the 2015-2016 school year. Inferential statistical procedures revealed the presence of clear inequities in the average number of days Grade 6, 7, and 8 students who were economically disadvantaged were assigned to an in-school suspension and to an out-of-school suspension. Grade 6, 7, and 8 students who were poor were assigned statistically significantly more days to in-school suspension and to out-of-school suspension than their grade level peers who were not poor. Implications of the findings are discussed and suggestions for further research are made.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here