z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
HAPPINESS IN KANT AND ROUSSEAU
Author(s) -
Michael Rohlf
Publication year - 1969
Publication title -
estudos kantianos
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2318-0501
DOI - 10.36311/2318-0501/2013.v1n2.3325
Subject(s) - happiness , pleasure , virtue , subjectivism , philosophy , psychology , eudaimonia , epistemology , social psychology , aesthetics , neuroscience
Most modern philosophers understand happiness fundamentally in terms of the subjective states of pleasure or desire satisfaction; while pre-modern philosophers tend to understand happiness fundamentally in terms of possessing certain objective goods like virtue, which do not reduce to pleasure or desire satisfaction, or engaging in objectively worthwhile activities like doing philosophy76. his paper investigates two modern conceptions of happiness: namely, Kant's and Rousseau's. I argue that their subjectivist conceptions of happiness do not prevent them from recognizing certain objective goods that help us to become happy. In fact, I argue that they both hold that some of the same objective goods that Aristotle thinks happiness consists in - including virtue, the development of our rational powers, and love of others - are either necessary for or at least tend to promote one's own happiness.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here