z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
COMPARATIVE CLINICAL STUDY OF NON-MESH VERSUS MESH REPAIR IN PRIMARY INGUINAL HERNIA
Author(s) -
Palash Saha,
Ved Rajan Arya,
Debarshi Jana
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
international journal of scientific research
Language(s) - English
DOI - 10.36106/ijsr/2702580
Subject(s) - medicine , inguinal hernia , surgery , fibrous joint , surgical mesh , hernia , postoperative pain , hernia repair , general surgery
Background: The inguinal regions are one of the natural weak areas in the abdominal wall and are the most common site of herniation. Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most frequently performed operations.Amis: The aim of this study is to compare open mesh and non-mesh suture repair of primary inguinal hernias with respect to clinical outcome which include postoperative pain, complications, time of return to work and recurrence.Matierial and methods: This prospective study of 102 cases of primary inguinal hernia repair was carried out at M.G.M. Medical College & L.S.K. Hospital, Kishanganj with the aim of comparing open mesh and non-mesh suture repair with respect to clinical outcome which included postoperative pain, complications time of return to work and recurrence.Result: In our study there were no specific criteria for allocation of the method of repair and of 102 patients 52 patients randomly underwent non-mesh repair and 50 patients underwent mesh repair.Conclusion: The use of prosthetic mesh allows tension-free repair of inguinal hernia and in theory better results. Our study proves the superiority of this method over non-mesh repair in the long term with regard to hernia recurrence; in addition, there were less complications and postoperative pain.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here