KANT’S CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE AND AQUINAS’ NATURAL LAW THEORY: A CRITICAL AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS | Zendy

E. P. C. | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

KANT’S CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE AND AQUINAS’ NATURAL LAW THEORY: A CRITICAL AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Author(s) -

E. P. C.

Publication year - 2020

Publication title -

addaiyan journal of arts humanities and social sciences

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

ISSN - 2581-8783

DOI - 10.36099/ajahss.2.9.1

Subject(s) - categorical imperative , epistemology , philosophy , exposition (narrative) , natural law , critical appraisal , categorical variable , subject (documents) , sociology , morality , mathematics , computer science , medicine , art , statistics , alternative medicine , literature , pathology , library science

This paper titled: “Kant’s Categorical Imperative and Aquinas’ Natural Law Theory: A Critical and Comparative Analysis”, is an attempt towards a better understanding of the compatibility or otherwise, that may exist between the works of the two great minds in the history of philosophy-Thomas Aquinas and Immanuel Kant. The paper aims at a critical comparison of the basic premises of Kant’s and Aquinas’s ethical philosophy, intending to find similarities and dissimilarities as well as compatibility or incompatibility between them. This paper adopts a conceptual clarification of our discourse and engages in an analytic, critical exposition, and appraisal of the subject matters.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research