z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Elastoplasty: A Silicon Polymer as a New Filling Material for Kyphoplasty in Comparison to PMMA
Author(s) -
Rahel Bornemann,
Yorck Rommelspacher,
Tom Jansen,
Kirsten Sander,
Dieter Christian Wirtz,
Robert Pflugmacher
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
pain physician
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.31
H-Index - 99
eISSN - 2150-1149
pISSN - 1533-3159
DOI - 10.36076/ppj/2016.19.e885
Subject(s) - medicine , oswestry disability index , visual analogue scale , bone cement , surgery , osteoporosis , balloon , adverse effect , vertebral compression fracture , retrospective cohort study , orthopedic surgery , low back pain , cement , vertebral body , alternative medicine , archaeology , pathology , history
Background: Painful vertebral compression fractures (VCF) caused by osteoporosis are acommon health problem in the elderly population. If conservative treatments are unsuccessful,surgical treatments like vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty are recommended. But the use ofPolymethylmethacrylat (PMMA) bone cement for augmentation surgery is associated with risks.Objectives: Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of a newly developed silicon polymer(VK100) that can be used instead of PMMA bone cement for kyphoplasty treatments.Study Design: A retrospective study of 30 patients comparing the outcomes of kyphoplastytreatments conducted with PMMA and VK100.Setting: Clinic for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery Bonn, Germany.Methods: Thirty patients with one to 3 VCF were treated either with balloon kyphoplasty usingVK100 or balloon kyphoplasty using PMMA bone cement. Data from both groups was comparedby a matched pair analysis. The medial vertebral height was measured at each examinationradiologically. The patients stated their pain intensity using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) andthe patient’s functional impairment was evaluated with the Oswestry-Disability-Index (ODI).All data were assessed before surgery, and 3 days, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months aftersurgery. Intraoperative and postoperative adverse events were documented.Results: The patients’ functional impairment and pain improved significantly after surgery. Thecourse of ODI and VAS was comparable in both treatment groups, but the improvement in theVK group was significantly ongoing until the 12 month follow-up. Vertebral height improvementwas significant in both groups, but the PMMA group achieved a better absolute restoration. Thevertebral height stayed constant during the follow-up in the VK group and worsened significantlyin the PMMA group. There was no significant difference between groups concerning theoccurrence of additional fractures; and no other types of complications or surgery-related adverseevents were observed in either the PMMA group or in the VK group.Limitations: The study is only a matched pair analysis of 15 patients for each procedure and theamount of injected filling material was not recorded.Conclusion(s): The study results demonstrate that the clinical outcome of VAS and ODI ofusing the silicon polymer VK100 is comparable or slightly better than using PMMA. VK 100 showsa trend to minor additional fractures during the follow-up. However, height restoration is notsatisfactory in comparison to PMMA, although vertebral height stayed more or less constant in theVK group. To address the augmentation success further, it would be necessary to study a largerpatient group over a longer study period and to assess additional parameters such as bone densityand injected amount of filling material.Key words: Vertebral compression fracture, kyphoplasty, augmentation, osteoporosis, backpain, VK 100, elastoplasty

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here