z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
High Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Therapy For Chronic Neuropathic Pain: A Meta-analysis
Author(s) -
Qiwen Mu
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
pain physician
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.31
H-Index - 99
eISSN - 2150-1149
pISSN - 1533-3159
DOI - 10.36076/ppj.2015/18/e1029
Subject(s) - transcranial magnetic stimulation , medicine , analgesic , meta analysis , neuropathic pain , cochrane library , anesthesia , randomized controlled trial , confidence interval , stimulation
Background: Increasing evidence supports an analgesic effect of repetitive transcranial magneticstimulation (rTMS) for neuropathic pain (NP). However, the optimal parameters of rTMS (stimulationfrequency and treatment sessions) for achieving long-term analgesic effects remain unknown. Thisstudy analyzed the current findings in the literature.Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the optimal parameters of rTMS for NP, includingthe rTMS sessions needed for inducing acute as well as long-term analgesic effects.Study Design: A meta-analysis of the analgesic effect of high frequency rTMS (HF- rTMS) forneuropathic patients.Setting: This meta-analysis examined all studies involving the analgesic efficacy of HF-rTMS forNP.Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched for clinical studies of rTMStreatment on NP published before December 31, 2014. Crude standardized mean differences(SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for pain intensity after different treatmentsessions (from 1 to 10) and follow-up of one or 2 months after rTMS treatment using randomeffect models.Results: Twenty-five studies (including 32 trials and 589 patients) were selected for the metaanalysis according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All 3 HF-rTMS treatments (5, 10, and 20Hz) produced pain reduction, while there were no differences between them, with the maximalpain reduction found after one and 5 sessions of rTMS treatment. Further, this significant analgesiceffect remained forone month after 5 sessions of rTMS treatment.Limitations: There are limitations of this meta-analysis. For example, the long-term analgesiceffects of different HF-rTMS and low frequency (LF) rTMS sessions, including the single session ofrTMS on different NP of varying origins have yet not been evaluated; the full degree of pain reliefis still unclear for many rTMS studies.Conclusions: HF-rTMS stimulation on primary motor cortex is effective in relieving pain in NPpatients. Although 5 sessions of rTMS treatment produced a maximal analgesic effect and maybe maintained for at least one month, further large-scale and well-controlled trials are neededto determine if this enhanced effect is specific to certain types of NP such as post-stroke relatedcentral NP.Key words: High frequency, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, neuropathic pain,single stimulation, multiple stimulation, meta-analysis

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom