z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Effect of Individually Tailored Biopsychosocial Workplace Interventions on Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain and Stress Among Laboratory Technicians: Randomized Controlled Trial
Author(s) -
Kenneth Jay
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
pain physician
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.31
H-Index - 99
eISSN - 2150-1149
pISSN - 1533-3159
DOI - 10.36076/ppj.2015/18/459
Subject(s) - medicine , physical therapy , randomized controlled trial , biopsychosocial model , mindfulness , psychological intervention , chronic pain , musculoskeletal pain , physical medicine and rehabilitation , psychiatry , clinical psychology
Background: Chronic musculoskeletal pain is prevalent among laboratory technicians andwork-related stress may aggravate the problem.Objectives: This study investigated the effect of a multifaceted worksite intervention on painand stress among laboratory technicians with chronic musculoskeletal pain using individuallytailored physical and cognitive elements.Study Design: This trial uses a single-blind randomized controlled design with allocationconcealment in a 2-armed parallel group format among laboratory technicians. The trial“Implementation of physical exercise at the Workplace (IRMA09) – Laboratory technicians“was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov prior to participant enrolment.Setting: The study was conducted at the head division of a large private pharmaceuticalcompany’s research and development department in Denmark. The study duration was March2014 (baseline) to July 2014 (follow-up).Methods: Participants (n = 112) were allocated to receive either physical, cognitive, andmindfulness group-based training (PCMT group) or a reference group (REF) for 10 weeks at theworksite. PCMT consisted of 4 major elements: 1) resistance training individually tailored to thepain affected area, 2) motor control training, 3) mindfulness, and 4) cognitive and behavioraltherapy/education. Participants of the REF group were encouraged to follow ongoing companyhealth initiatives. The predefined primary outcome measure was pain intensity (VAS scale 0 –10) in average of the regions: neck, shoulder, lower and upper back, elbow, and hand at 10week follow-up. The secondary outcome measure was stress assessed by Cohen´s perceivedstress questionnaire. In addition, an explorative dose-response analysis was performed on theadherence to PCMT with pain and stress, respectively, as outcome measures.Results: A significant (P < 0.0001) treatment by time interaction in pain intensity was observedwith a between-group difference at follow-up of -1.0 (95%CI: -1.4 to -0.6). No significanteffect on stress was observed (treatment by time P = 0.16). Exploratory analyses for each bodyregion separately showed significant pain reductions of the neck, shoulders, upper back andlower back, as well as a tendency for hand pain.Within the PCMT group, general linear models adjusted for age, baseline pain, and stress levelsshowed significant associations for the change in pain with the number of physical-cognitivetraining sessions per week (-0.60 [95%CI -0.95 to -0.25]) and the number of mindfulnesssessions (0.15 [95%CI 0.02 to 0.18]). No such associations were found with the change in stressas outcome.Limitations: Limitations of behavioral interventions include the inability to blind participantsto which intervention they receive. Self-reported outcomes are a limitation as they may beinfluenced by placebo effects and outcome expectations

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here