z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Differential Treatment of Nerve Root Compression Pain Caused by Lumbar Disc Herniation Applying Nucleoplasty
Author(s) -
Andrey Bokov
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
pain physician
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.31
H-Index - 99
eISSN - 2150-1149
pISSN - 1533-3159
DOI - 10.36076/ppj.2010/13/469
Subject(s) - medicine , oswestry disability index , disc herniation , surgery , confidence interval , nerve root , visual analogue scale , low back pain , decompression , randomized controlled trial , lumbar disc herniation , prospective cohort study , back pain , lumbar , alternative medicine , pathology
Background: Nucleoplasty is a minimally invasive intervention use to perform discdecompression in cases of nerve root compression caused by disc herniation. It is importantto find rational guidelines for choosing between nucleoplasty and microsurgery.Objective: To analyze factors that may impact the results of nucleoplasty, and to validatethe rational guidelines between minimally invasive treatment and open surgery.Study Design: Prospective, non-randomized, cohort study with a minimal follow-upperiod of 18 months.Methods: Patients were given a neurological examination, visual analogue scale andOswestry disability questionnaire, obligatory MRI, optional RCT, and discography, onlybefore nucleoplasty. Patients have been divided into the following groups: Group 1 –patients with a disc protrusion treated with nucleoplasty (n = 46), which has been dividedinto Subgroup 1A, those with a disc protrusion size ≤ 5 mm (n = 24), and Subgroup 1B,those with a disc protrusion size 6 – 9 mm (n = 22); Group 2 – patients with a disc extrusiontreated with nucleoplasty (n = 27); Group 3 – patients with a disc extrusion or sequestertreated with microdiscectomy (n = 65).Outcome Measures: Clinically significant outcomes were a 50% relief of pain intensityand a 40% decrease of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).Results: A decrease of pain intensity and disability was found in all groups of patients, P< 0.0001; SP (statistical power) = 99 – 100%. Subgroups 1A and 1B showed no clinicallysignificant differences in outcome, P = 0.99; SP = 5.3. Clinically significant results: Group 1– 78%; 95% CI (confidence interval) [66; 90%], Group 2 – 44%; 95% CI [25; 65%], Group3 – 93%; 95% CI [85; 98%]. Total annulus disruption increases the rate of unsatisfactoryresults of nucleoplasty, OR (odds ratio) = 4.5; 95% CI [1.57; 12.87] (logistic regressionmodel, P = 0.0034). Nucleoplasty performed in cases of uncontained disc herniation (discextrusion) have a significantly higher rate of unsatisfactory results versus microdiscectomy,OR = 19.06; 95% CI [2.29; 68.73] (logistic regression model, P < 0.0001).Limitations: This study was limited by the small number of patients in each group.Conclusion: The size of the disc protrusion does not significantly affect the outcomeof nucleoplasty. The rational guideline for choosing between the 2 types of surgery is theintegrity of the annulus.Key words: disc herniation, nucleoplasty, microdiscectomy, annulus integrity

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here