
Implanted Occipital Nerve Stimulators
Author(s) -
Joseph F. Jasper,
Salim M. Hayek
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
pain physician
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.31
H-Index - 99
eISSN - 2150-1149
pISSN - 1533-3159
DOI - 10.36076/ppj.2008/11/187
Subject(s) - medicine , cervicogenic headache , occipital nerve stimulation , occipital neuralgia , cluster headache , chronic migraine , migraine , headaches , neurostimulation , randomized controlled trial , anesthesia , physical therapy , neuralgia , stimulation , surgery , neuropathic pain , alternative medicine , pathology
Background: Chronic headache represents a very significant public health and economicissue. One treatment modality for chronic refractory headache involves the use of subcutaneous implanted neurostimulator leads in the occipital region. Varied types of headache etiologies including migraine, transformed migraine, chronic daily headache, cluster headache,hemicrania continua, occipital neuralgia, and cervicogenic headache have been studied withperipheral nerve field stimulation and found responsive to stimulation of the suboccipital region, known commonly as occipital nerve stimulation (ONS).Objective: To evaluate the strength of evidence that occipital nerve stimulation is an effective treatment of benign headache.Study Design: A systematic review of occipital nerve stimulation for the treatment ofchronic headache.Methods: A systematic review of the literature through EMBASE and PubMed/Medline forclinical studies was performed. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) criteria was utilized to assess the evidence regarding occipital nerve stimulators and arrives atconclusions as to their efficacy in the treatment of headache. Studies were also graded using AHRQ criteria. The overall body of evidence was then graded on a 5 level scale from Level I (conclusive), Level II (strong), Level III (moderate), Level IV (limited) to Level V (indeterminate).Results: Ten observational studies, of which 4 were prospective, and a number of case series, case reports, and reviews were identified. No randomized controlled trials (RCT) wereidentified. All of the articles reported positive outcomes including improved pain relief, reduced frequency, intensity, and duration of headaches with reduced medication consumption. ONS was reportedly successful for 70 – 100% of patients. Reduction of pain in patientswith occipital headaches and transformed migraine is significant and rapid; for cluster patients the improvement may be less dramatic and it may take several months of occipitalstimulation to achieve relief.No long-term adverse events occurred. Several short-term incidents occurred including infection, lead displacement, and battery depletion. The body of evidence as a whole is a level of strength of IV, limited.Conclusion: ONS is a useful tool in the treatment of chronic severe headaches with at leastLevel IV (limited) evidence based on multiple positive studies.Key Words: headache, chronic daily headache, occipital neuralgia, cervicogenic headache, migraine, transformed migraine, cluster headache, neuromodulation, neurostimulation, stimulator, peripheral nerve stimulation.