z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Zainab’s Murder: Heinous Crimes, Speedy Trial and the Challenge of Procedural Rights
Author(s) -
Ali Chughtai
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
review of human rights
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2520-7032
pISSN - 2520-7024
DOI - 10.35994/rhr.v4i1.85
Subject(s) - suspect , confession (law) , punishment (psychology) , law , jurisprudence , criminology , procedural law , fair trial , political science , psychology , human rights , social psychology
In early 2018, a seven-year old girl, Zainab Amin, was raped and murdered in district Kasur, Punjab province, Pakistan. The cold-blooded incident shocked the people across the country. These questions included the suspect’s confession before trial, the in-camera trial being completed within four consecutive working days, the cross-examination of 56 witnesses, and the paucity of time given to the defence counsel. In this paper I argue that although such heinous offences should be awarded legally warranted punishment, the courts must ensure that the special criminal procedure does not let go the principle of due process. I take Zainab’s case as an example to see whether the principle of due process and procedural rights of the suspect were ensured as required for a fair trial. The paper puts to critical light the chronological facts of the case (as reported in the press) and relies on applied jurisprudence to underscore the potential/danger of letting go the due process and procedural rights in speedy trials.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here