Open AccessInstitutional Model in Management of Drainage System
Author(s) -
Henny Pratiwi Adi,
Slamet Imam Wahyudi
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
international journal of innovative technology and exploring engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2278-3075
DOI - 10.35940/ijitee.l3449.129219
Subject(s) - drainage , business , government (linguistics) , drainage system (geomorphology) , flood myth , flooding (psychology) , environmental planning , environmental resource management , economics , environmental science , geography , psychology , ecology , philosophy , linguistics , archaeology , psychotherapist , biology
Flood is a regular problem in Semarang. The causes of flooding include changes in land use, intensity and high rainfall and erosion and sedimentation in the river channel. Development efforts for flood control has been conducted, such as the development and optimization of drainage systems. Maintenance and operation of the drainage system supported by the good institutional capacity is expected to handle the problem of flooding. Therefore, the right institutional model is necessary in the management of the drainage system of Semarang. The research data were obtained through a variety of literature as well as interviews with the parties related to the management of drainage in Semarang. There was three institutional model of drainage system management implemented in Semarang were institutional model of government-based, institutional model of community-based, and institutional model of stakeholders-based. There were 24 respondents from government, municipality, entrepreneurs and communities who have assessed the institutional model of drainage system management. Each institutional model analyzed in the five aspects of drainage management, namely technical, institutional, legal, financial and community participation. The results of the study showed that the most appropriate institutional model for managing the drainage system in Semarang is institutional model of stakeholders-based. This institutional model has the advantage such as drainage system maintenance can be handled more quickly, the legal regulations issued by the government and financing sources drainage system can come from any source, such as the central government, municipalities, grants, and also from non-governmental.