Open AccessEvaluation for Improving Security Management of Service Oriented Architecture At Meraki Digital Indonesia
Author(s) -
Indra Ranggadara
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
international journal of innovative technology and exploring engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2278-3075
DOI - 10.35940/ijitee.i8067.078919
Subject(s) - cobit , computer science , process management , analytic hierarchy process , service (business) , consistency (knowledge bases) , knowledge management , security management , architecture , risk analysis (engineering) , computer security , information technology , operations research , business , engineering , marketing , artificial intelligence , operating system , art , visual arts
Meraki Digital Indonesia wants to evaluate security management on Service Oriented Architecture that has been implemented in this company whether it is in accordance with the standards or not, using the COBIT 5 method. It is expected that the suitability of the maturity level can be carried out in accordance with the security management domain needed to ensure the fulfillment of the basic requirements of organizational information resources, namely the availability of integrity and availability of data or information. As well as using the Analytical Hierarchy Process algorithm to provide recommendations using decision-making in solving problems with explicit logical analysis, there are three principles that underlie AHP thinking, which is compiling hierarchies, the principle of setting priorities, and the principle of logical consistency. Then the evaluation results using COBIT 5, there are 6 security management criteria that are used as a basis for evaluating, among others, strategies & policies, organizations, people, processes, technology and facilities and domains that are used are Plan and Organizes (PO), Acquire and Implement (AI), Deliver and Support (DS), and Monitor and Evaluate (ME). Whereas for recommendations needed by using analytical hierarchy processes, there are three things that need to be improved according to the wishes of stakeholders, namely the need to improve the criteria of technology with a value of 0.132, facilities with a value of 0.137, and people with a value of 0.161 according to the lowest ranking on the tested criteria.