
Assessment of Industrial and Financial Applications of Innovation Development
Author(s) -
Yuriy A. Shamsutdinov*,
Pavel P. Bochkovskiy,
Konstantin V. Lebedvev,
Igor Khasuntsev
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
international journal of innovative technology and exploring engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2278-3075
DOI - 10.35940/ijitee.d1664.029420
Subject(s) - index (typography) , purchasing power parity , premise , gini coefficient , developing country , economics , per capita , baseline (sea) , economic growth , business , inequality , mathematics , macroeconomics , economic inequality , computer science , political science , exchange rate , mathematical analysis , linguistics , philosophy , world wide web , population , demography , sociology , law
The purpose of this study is to make an analysis of indicators and methods used to calculate the Global Innovation Index (GII), which assesses the level of innovation development in a country . Within this index the shortcomings lead to overestimation for the developing countries . These indicators predominantly reflect not the achieved innovation development level, butthecountry’spotentialtoachieve it. The GDP (less than the resource rent ), calculated using the purchasing power parity and normalized per the number of people employed in a country, was chosen as baseline. In calculating the integral indicator (Ri), the baseline was adjustedforthecountry’s competitiveness level and the Gini coefficient. The integral indicator values were derived for the selected states of OECD and BRICS (total of 38 countries) and the countries were ranked respectively . To substantiate the validity of the suggested methodology and the objectiveness of the assessment, a comparison with the estimates using the GII was carried out. It is offered to estimate the achieved innovation level by the outcome indicators, namely, by the indicators reflecting the attained level of social and economic development on the premise that this level has been reached due to innovation and these indicatorsareinvarianttothecountries’developmentlevel. The suggested methodology can be considered either separately in the process of assessing the innovation development level of a country or as a complementary to the assessment using the GII , which allows to analyze the country’s prospects in terms of innovationproceedingfromthe‘attainedlevel’.