z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparative Analysis of Similarities and Differences between Null Hypotheses, Assumption of Breach
Author(s) -
Ahmad Hedayatpanah Shaldehi,
Mohammad Saeed hedayatpanah shaldehi,
Marziyeh Hedayatpanah Shaldehi
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
indian journal of advanced mathematics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2582-8932
DOI - 10.35940/ijam.b1110.101221
Subject(s) - null hypothesis , reductio ad absurdum
The main purpose of this paper is to comparatively study the similarities and differences between of the , null hypothesis and assumption of breach .The null hypothesis , in applied researches, particularly experiments for confirm or rejection .a hypothesis, regard to inferential statistics That used in many different fields of humanities researchers, particularly psychology, education, management and sociological placed assumption of breach, to prove geometric proposition( theorems), which hypothetical temporary, that with the help of reasoning, the false statements, it we conclude. Such a statement may deny our hypotheses or assume reduction ad absurdum. The use of these two words separately and hypothesis alternative in abundance, the world of science and research, has been discussed, but the relationship between these words, mention, yet. Isn’t .This article describes the relation of these assumptions. Likewise, in writing, to the similarity, their differentiation, are mentioned. Including the results, that is, the achieve results null hypothesis, researcher with the error is encountered, but In the Reduction ad absurdum the achieve results, not an error.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here