data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c3fd/2c3fd2c05ec175716150fd2054ac6d9c19b5c66f" alt="open-access-img"
Rewolucja obywatelska w ujęciu Hannah Arendt a paradoksy działania politycznego
Author(s) -
Anna Krzynówek-Arndt
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
civitas
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2720-0353
pISSN - 1428-2631
DOI - 10.35757/civ.2013.15.02
Subject(s) - politics , dignity , conceptualization , emancipation , epistemology , sociology , power (physics) , element (criminal law) , order (exchange) , human life , human condition , public sphere , postmodernism , human being , environmental ethics , law , philosophy , political science , humanity , finance , quantum mechanics , linguistics , physics , economics
In the concept of revolution there are two essential elements of political life. The first one is the fragility and sensitivity of the world of things created by human beings, lack of durability and strong support of the political order. The other element is the human ability to create and build a new order with hope for its survival. However, a more adequate approach to understand these elements is conceptualization of politics and political actions that anticipate the opening of the public sphere to the traditional and religious arguments (desecularization of religion as an impress of the postmodern epoch), and also to the problems of dignity of human work. What is also important is the awareness that it requires redefinition of the anthropological assumptions and a radical broadening of understanding how humans act according to what Hannah Arendt proposes. Moreover, it is important to understand that the redefinition means something more than just retouching as it is defined by Habermas, who believes in “laic communicative power” even in spite of mentioning “complementary learning process” of religion and secular outlook from yourself.