
Knowledge Triumphant
Author(s) -
Sajjad Rizvi
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
american journal of islam and society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2690-3741
pISSN - 2690-3733
DOI - 10.35632/ajis.v25i4.1441
Subject(s) - islam , philosophy , plural , argument (complex analysis) , subject (documents) , philology , classics , epistemology , poetry , literature , sociology , history , art , theology , linguistics , feminism , gender studies , biochemistry , chemistry , library science , computer science
Brill’s new “Classics in Islam” series, a systematic reprinting of some ofthe seminal works in Islamic studies that have been out of print fordecades, is a welcome initiative.As Dimitri Gutas, a former student, indicatesin his introduction, Rosenthal’s achievement in this monograph is outstandingwithin an exceptionally productive and influential career. It isalso somewhat unusual that a work first published over thirty years ago stillremains unsurpassed, even if one may question some of the argument’sdetails and tendencies. Rosenthal often worked with manuscripts andunedited sources and, while we have the luxury of criticizing his judgmentsbased on our access to superior critical editions, the contribution of the bookremains singular.
As befits a social and intellectual historian, Rosenthal’s survey commenceswith the philology of the word knowledge (`ilm) and works throughinstances in early Islam andArabic poetry before moving on to chapters ondefinition, theology, Sufism, philosophy, and finally concluding with a chapteron the social contexts and uses of knowledge. While there are now anumber of works that deal with aspects of these chapters, no one hasattempted to reconstruct a survey quite like this. Each chapter could well bethe subject of monographs and, as Gutas suggests, numerous sections couldact as inspiration for “untold dissertations.” Rosenthal begins with the claimthat civilizations tend to revolve around meaningful concepts of an abstractnature that,more than anything else, give themtheir distinctive nature; in thecase of Islam, this is the centrality of knowledge and the pursuit of knowledge.While he shifts from the plural to the singular and back, one retains thecentral point that the field of knowledge is unified. The fact is that Muslimscholars in very different fields of inquiry were able to retain a concept of`ilm that was broadly cognate and transferable ...