
The Knowledge of Reality: Critical Assessment of Stanley J.Grenz’s Methodology
Author(s) -
Yevhen Shatalov
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
mulʹtiversum. filosofskij alʹmanah
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2078-8142
DOI - 10.35423/2078-8142.2018.1-2.16
Subject(s) - epistemology , objectivity (philosophy) , sociology , rubric , narrative , context (archaeology) , realism , interpretation (philosophy) , social reality , postmodernism , philosophy , pedagogy , biology , paleontology , linguistics
The article is devoted to the study of the knowledge of Reality in the context of critical assessment of Stanley J. Grenz’s methodology. Many contemporary Evangelical scholars who study the question about our knowledge of Reality think that «critical realism» is the best model that describes the process of knowledge in the postmodern context. Grenz supports the constructivist model of knowledge. Vanhoozer believes that hermeneutical epistemology is the best rubric for discussing theological truth claims about reality. Grenz speaks about «givenness» to this world which is eschatological, and thus he talks only about eschatological objectivity. Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann, on whom Grenz’s draws his constructivist’s views, make their thesis about social construction of reality and knowledge through the language (the constructivist view). We think Grenz says that language creates our understanding of reality.