z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Glaucon's Question Ignored: Republic 519a-521b
Author(s) -
James P. Butler
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
akropolis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.101
H-Index - 1
eISSN - 2536-5738
pISSN - 2536-572X
DOI - 10.35296/jhs.v2i0.21
Subject(s) - socrates , happiness , dismissal , the republic , contemplation , guardian , philosophy , focus (optics) , epistemology , literature , psychology , political science , law , social psychology , art , physics , optics
At Republic 519a-521b, Socrates claims that each guardian  must return from his/her contemplation to run Kallipolis. Quite reasonably, Glaucon objects that they would be making the guardian's life worse than it could be. This is sometimes referred to as “the happy philosopher problem”. But rather than answering Glaucon, Socrates admonishes him that their focus is instead on the role of the class of guardians and the happiness of the whole city. It turns out this admonition is the last in a string of similar admonitions that Socrates gives to his interlocutors. This paper examines Socrates' admonition to Glaucon, and its relation to Socrates’ other warnings  to focus on the happiness of the city. By examining these admonitions, we can defend Socrates' dismissal of Glaucon's question and the happy philosopher question at 519d. The paper concludes by examining a few strategies for interpreting Socrates’ reluctance to engage Glaucon’s question.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here