
Visualizing the terror threat
Author(s) -
Maria dos Santos Lonsdale,
David J. Lonsdale,
Matthew Baxter,
Ryan A. Graham,
Aya Kanafani,
Anqi Li,
Chunxinzi Peng
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
visible language
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2691-5529
pISSN - 0022-2224
DOI - 10.34314/vl.v53i2.4645
Subject(s) - infographic , usability , computer science , terrorism , information security , graphics , information visualization , empirical research , computer security , information design , visualization , internet privacy , human–computer interaction , political science , artificial intelligence , data mining , philosophy , computer graphics (images) , epistemology , law
Terrorism represents one of the most pressing contemporary security threats. As a consequence, governments provide information to the public on threat levels and on how to respond to terror incidents. To effectively reassure the public, and to increase their vigilance, it is essential that the information communicated is accessible, clear, actionable and engaging. This is the first empirical study in the world to explore the impact of information design principles and visualization of information on the communication of security information related to terrorism. Two different but complementary strands were devised: Strand 1 - compared whether more visualized information was more effective than text dense information at communicating to the public; Strand 2 - compared whether a motion graphics was more effective than an infographic at communicating to the public. An initial usability test was conducted to identify existing problems and needs. Several other usability tests and iterations were then conducted to develop new design solutions. Empirical testing was then conducted for final evaluation and validation, collecting quantitative and qualitative data. Results show significant differences between pre- and post-knowledge of the Terror Threat Levels. Results also show significant differences between text dense information and more visualized information. Results further show no significant difference between communicating information via an infographic or motion graphics in situations where information needs to be assimilated as a crescendo (i.e. levels of severity) or as a series of steps to be followed (action in an emergency). This study provides important guidelines on how to effectively communicate security information to the public, with practical implications for security agencies.