z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategy Use between Field-Dependent and Field-Independent EFL Learners
Author(s) -
G. Alireza Navid M
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
shanlax international journal of english
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2320-2645
DOI - 10.34293/english.v10i1.4260
Subject(s) - metacognition , reading (process) , psychology , turkish , cognition , english as a foreign language , test (biology) , field (mathematics) , significant difference , mathematics education , linguistics , medicine , paleontology , philosophy , mathematics , neuroscience , pure mathematics , biology
This paper aimed to study the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies between field-dependent (FD)and field-independent (FI) Turkish EFL university students who are learning English as a foreign language. To this end, 270 students from Istanbul (Cerrahpasa) University were chosen.First, Group Embedded Figure Test was used to appoint the participants into either FD or FI groups.After this, participants’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategy was assessed by using MARSI-R (Metacognitive Awareness of reading Strategies Inventory-Revised). Recently revised by Mokhtari et al., the MARSI-R instrument contains 15 items and measures three large sets of strategies including: Global Reading Strategies (GRS), Problem-Solving Strategies (PSS) and Support Reading Strategies (SRS).The results showed that the students reported using the 3 categories of strategies almost at a high-frequency level and they were aware of their metacognitive strategies. And statistically significant difference was found between FI and FD students regarding their use of GRS and SRS, hence, the use of students’ metacognitive reading strategies was affected by their different FI/FD cognitive styles.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here