z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Hur legitimeras socialpolitiska besparingar?
Author(s) -
Niklas Altermark
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
socialvetenskaplig tidskrift
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2003-5624
pISSN - 1104-1420
DOI - 10.3384/svt.2017.24.2.2395
Subject(s) - austerity , scrutiny , work (physics) , business , government (linguistics) , public economics , public relations , economics , law and economics , political science , law , politics , engineering , mechanical engineering , linguistics , philosophy
How are cutbacks in social policy legitimized? The construction of personal assistance as a ”cost problem”This article seeks to explain how current austerity measures targeting personal assistance for people with disabilities are legitimized. Following the work of Bacchi and Ingram and Schneider, I argue that the construction of personal assistance as a ”cost problem” is absolutely central, where assistance-users are depicted as ”over-users” and potential fraudsters, while personal assistance companies are described as solely motivated by maximizing profits. However, upon closer scrutiny, the actual cutbacks that the government has implemented do not match how the ”cost problem is constructed”; the policies aimed to reduce costs are not particularly e cient to reduce benefit frauds or hamper profits. This suggests that the ”cost problem” is not the rational ground for policy, but an ad hoc construction that serves the purpose of justifying general cutbacks striking at all personal assistance users.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here