z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Politics of the Gaze: Foucault, Lacan and Žižek
Author(s) -
Henry Krips
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
culture unbound
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.256
H-Index - 7
ISSN - 2000-1525
DOI - 10.3384/cu.2000.1525.102691
Subject(s) - panopticon , gaze , parallels , michel foucault , politics , epistemology , psychoanalysis , sociology , the imaginary , philosophy , focus (optics) , aesthetics , psychology , law , political science , mechanical engineering , physics , optics , engineering
Joan Copjec accuses orthodox film theory of misrepresenting the Lacanian gaze by assimilating it to Foucauldian panopticon (Copjec 1994: 18-19). Although Copjec is correct that orthodox film theory misrepresents the Lacanian gaze, she, in turn, misrepresents Foucault by choosing to focus exclusively upon those as-pects of his work on the panopticon that have been taken up by orthodox film the-ory (Copjec 1994: 4). In so doing, I argue, Copjec misses key parallels between the Lacanian and Foucauldian concepts of the gaze. More than a narrow academic dispute about how to read Foucault and Lacan, this debate has wider political sig-nificance. In particular, using Slavoj Zizek's work, I show that a correct account of the panoptic gaze leads us to rethink the question of how to oppose modern techniques of surveillance

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here