Open AccessThe Effect of Pop Up Book Media on Mathematics Learning Outcomes in Building Space Materials on Class II
Author(s) -
Alfi Imroatus Solikhah,
M. Bambang Edi Siswanto
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
indonesian journal of primary science education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2775-0264
pISSN - 2746-1394
DOI - 10.33752/ijpse.v2i2.1836
Subject(s) - class (philosophy) , computer science , test (biology) , speculation , mathematics education , social media , artificial intelligence , mathematics , world wide web , paleontology , macroeconomics , economics , biology
The reason for this review is to add knowledge into the consequences of the pretest and post-test when and without the utilization of learning media as Pop Up Books on learning results of Mathematics, the impact of utilizing Pop Up Book media on understudy learning results. exploration is Pre-Experimental Design. This examination was led at SDN Kampungbaru III. The example in this review comprised of one class of 17 understudies. Into two gatherings where the principal meeting understudies are given learning not utilizing spring up book media or customary strategies while at the second gathering understudies are surrendered getting the hang of utilizing pop book media. Information examination strategies include: (1) Normality Test and (2) Hypothesis Testing or T Test, information investigation utilizing clear investigation and inferential factual examination with PC help with the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) adaptation 17.0 program. The consequences of the review can be reasoned that The capacity to comprehend understudies' spatial development material in the wake of utilizing spring up book media in class II SD Negeri Kampungbaru III understudies is sorted as fit, this is confirmed by the normal score acquired by understudies contacting the number 87-94 and the impact of learning Mathematics on the material of class II SD Negeri Kampungbaru III shows that there is a huge contrast of 0.000 which is more modest than the 0.05 importance (0.000 < 0.05), so the speculation (H) in this review is announced acknowledged.