z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Diagnostic Metods Ankle Joint
Author(s) -
С А Джумабеков,
У И Насиров,
U. Nazirov
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
bûlletenʹ nauki i praktiki
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2414-2948
DOI - 10.33619/2414-2948/70/35
Subject(s) - ankle , medicine , joint (building) , orthopedic surgery , ligament , tibia , syndesmosis , foot (prosody) , radiography , radiological weapon , physical medicine and rehabilitation , orthodontics , knee joint , subtalar joint , physical therapy , fibula , surgery , architectural engineering , linguistics , philosophy , engineering
103 patients with ankle injuries were examined. 81.3% of patients complained of pain. In 78.0% of patients, joint function was impaired, in 58.8% — joint deformation, in 72.9% — swelling in the joint area, in 79.6% — soreness in the projection of interbercular syndesmosis, in 87.7% — different severity of joint movement restriction. When analyzing radiographs, fractures of one or two ankles, foot subvisions both outside and behind, fractures of the posterior edge of the tibia were detected. The Foot and Ankle Disease Assessment Scale of the American Foot and Ankle Orthopedic Association (AOFAS) was used to objectively assess the functional state of the ankle joint. Known clinical and radiological methods of examination of the ankle joint make it possible for a person skilled in the art to detect damage to both the bone structure and the ligament apparatus. However, for objective assessment of the functional state of the ankle joint and foot, it is recommended to use scales of clinical assessment of the ankle joint state.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here