
"Non-toxic" endophytes in ryegrass and their effect on livestock health and production
Author(s) -
L. R. Fletcher
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
grassland research and practice series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2463-4751
pISSN - 0110-8581
DOI - 10.33584/rps.7.1999.3393
Subject(s) - endophyte , neotyphodium , grazing , lolium perenne , biology , agronomy , perennial plant , hectare , lolium , acremonium , poaceae , botany , ecology , agriculture
Ryegrass/endophyte associations have been developed which produce peramine, but not the endophyte toxins ergovaline or lolitrem B. Sheep grazing these ryegrasses in small paddocks and in a systems trial over three years gained weight as rapidly as those grazing endophyte-free ryegrass, and showed none of the adverse responses associated with grazing ryegrass naturally infected with wild-type endophyte (Neotyphodium lolii). Growth rates, rectal temperatures, respiration rates, serum prolactin concentrations, ryegrass staggers scores and scores for dag burdens were equivalent for the selected endophyte and nil endophyte treatments, whereas sheep grazing the wild-type endophyte treatment were adversely affected for all parameters. This was reflected in calculated gross margins for the systems trial of only $605 per hectare for the wild-type endophyte treatment compared with over $700 per hectare for each of the other treatments. To date there have been no conclusive studies of non-toxic endophyte with cattle. Keywords: AR1, dags, endophyte, ergovaline, liveweight gain, lolitrem B, Lolium perenne, Neotyphodium, peramine, perennial ryegrass, prolactin, sheep