
Replies to Ben-Ze’ev, Starkey, Reyes Càrdenas, Bloomfield, LaGuardia-LoBianco, and Mendonça
Author(s) -
Michael S. Brady
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of philosophy of emotion
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2689-8187
DOI - 10.33497/2021.summer.8
Subject(s) - virtue , perception , value (mathematics) , function (biology) , psychology , section (typography) , social psychology , epistemology , humanities , psychoanalysis , philosophy , computer science , evolutionary biology , machine learning , biology , operating system
In this section, I respond to all six of my commentators. I acknowledge a number of areas where the book could be improved—not least in terms of the categorisation of theories of emotion; the emphasis on the positive value of emotion as opposed to emotion’s negative aspects; and the need to consider how emotions function in a broader range of circumstances. Alongside this, I welcome the defences of the perceptual model and new perspectives on the relations between emotion and virtue that a number of commentators present.