z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Epistemic Injustice Expressed in “Normalizing” Surgery on Children with Intersex Traits
Author(s) -
Renata Ziemińska
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
diametros
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.195
H-Index - 8
ISSN - 1733-5566
DOI - 10.33392/diam.1478
Subject(s) - injustice , harm , epistemology , expression (computer science) , grasp , psychology , philosophy , social psychology , computer science , programming language
I present the notion of epistemic injustice coined by Miranda Fricker and apply it to the situation of people with intersex traits, especially intersex children who are the subjects of “normalizing” surgery. Several studies from Polish hospitals show that both early “normalizing” surgery and the decision to postpone such surgery can result in harm to an intersex child. For this reason, I claim that “normalizing” surgery is only an expression of the epistemic hermeneutical injustice existing before the surgery and that its source is the lack of an empirically adequate notion of sex characteristics. The binary notion is too simple to grasp intersex traits, and this epistemic dysfunction turns into practical harm. In contrast to Morgan Carpenter, I defend the nonbinary gender category as being important to limiting “normalizing” surgery.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here