z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
AN ERROR ANALYSIS ON ENGLISH GERUNDS MADE BY THE SIXTH SEMESTER STUDENTS OF ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM OF UNIB IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2017/2018
Author(s) -
Recci Nuzirwan,
Imranuddin,
Arasuli
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of english education and teaching
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2685-743X
pISSN - 2622-5867
DOI - 10.33369/jeet.2.4.42-47
Subject(s) - gerund , sentence , object (grammar) , linguistics , subject (documents) , computer science , research object , mathematics education , psychology , natural language processing , artificial intelligence , noun , sociology , philosophy , regional science , library science
The objectives of this research are to find out the types of errors and the most dominant error of using gerunds (as a subject of a sentence, as an object of preposition or after pr eposition, as a direct object of certain verbs, after a special expression and as a passive form) by the sixth semesterstudents  of  English  Education  Study  Program  of  UNIB in the academic year of  2017/2018.  The sample  of  this  research  consisted  of  77  students.  This  research  used  descriptive  quantitative method. The result of the analysis shows that the students made errors in all five types of gerunds. There were 27.1% (809) errors of using gerund as direct object of certain verbs, 24.5% (735) errors of using gerund as passive form, 20.8% (624) errors of using gerund after special expression, 15.5% (463) errors of using gerund as object of preposition or after preposition, 12.1% (361) errors of using gerund as subject of a sentence. Evidently, the most dominant errors made by the students of using gerund were the gerunds as direct object of certain verbs.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here