z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Analisis Corak Pemikiran Fikih K.H. Lanre Said Al-Bugisi
Author(s) -
Syandri Syandri,
Ilham Kadir,
Azwar Iskandar
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
tribakti
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2502-3047
pISSN - 1411-9919
DOI - 10.33367/tribakti.v32i1.1415
Subject(s) - jurisprudence , fiqh , islam , law , sociology , sharia , philosophy , epistemology , theology , political science
This research aims to find out the pattern of Islamic jurisprudence’s thought and the ijtihad method of K.H. Lanre Said. This research is a qualitative descriptive using data related to Islamic jurisprudence’s thought of K.H. Lanre Said. The results showed that the knowledge of K.H. Lanre Said in the field of Islamic jurisprudence is enough high. Although it looks practical and simple, his ability to decipher the opinions of scholars is very good especially in the description of evidence derived from hadith. He expressed the opinions of the scholars then conclude them, although in several problems he did not choose one opinion of the scholars even made his own opinion. The Islamic jurisprudence concept in his mind is enough dynamic because he wrote many laws in jurisprudence problems relating to the law of ablution (taharah) until corpse (janazah) and other issues that are widely questioned and often occur in the community. In general, it can be said that the pattern of K.H. Lanre Said’s thought does not depend on just one sect (mazhab), even he encourage the freedom of embracing the spect.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here