Open AccessEvaluation of the effectiveness of dental implants with the use of 3D programming software and surgical guided
Author(s) -
Gagik Hakobyan,
L. Essayain,
G. Khachatryan,
Anush Khachatryan,
T. Kijomova,
L. Gilamiryan,
I. Gazazyan
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
sučasna stomatologìâ/sovremennaâ stomatologiâ
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1992-576X
pISSN - 2786-7641
DOI - 10.33295/1992-576x-2020-4-38
Subject(s) - medicine , dental implant , implant , surgical planning , radiation treatment planning , dentistry , surgery , radiation therapy
Background. The use of modern digital technologies significantly changes the classical approaches to planning and conducting dental implantation. The whole process can be accomplished performed thus, so that the ideal placement of the implant can be achieved without the injured anatomical structure. Purpose. To evaluate the effectiveness of dental implant placement with the use of 3D-modeling and surgical guided. Materials and methods. A total of 148 patients with ridge defects in age group were selected for the study. All patients had a partially or totally edentulous. Computer scans, three-dimensional computer modeling were used to plan operations. 2 Patient groups were formed to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment using 3D modeling and surgical guided. Patients were included in group I, at the planning stage only a CT scan was used, Group II included patients who underwent a CT scan, 3D computer modeling (3 Shape Implant Studio) during the planning phase, and surgical guided (were fabricated with a desktop 3D printer Stratasys), were used in the surgical phase, the dental defect was restored with the with implant insertion. Results. In Group I, intraoperative or immediate post-operative complications were noted (errors in the position, inclination), anatomical risk structures were invaded, after 3 years producing a survival rate of 96.2 %. In Group II, no intra-operative or immediate post-operative complications were noted (no errors in the position, inclination,), no anatomical risk structures, after 3 years producing a survival rate of 97.6 %. Conclusion. The 3D modeling method and the use of surgical guided for dental implantation significantly risk the complications. Implant placement through the precision surgical guide is more accurate than freehand placement into the osteotomy, the guides allow installation of dental implants in the most optimal position for future prosthetic work, depth, and inclination.