z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A Critical Study of Robert Nozick’s View on Utilitarianism
Author(s) -
Sajia Afrin
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
philosophy and progress
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2305-6851
pISSN - 1607-2278
DOI - 10.3329/pp.v61i1-2.44208
Subject(s) - utilitarianism , monster , utopia , philosophy , irrational number , doctrine , epistemology , law and economics , positive economics , economics , sociology , law , political science , mathematics , art history , theology , art , geometry
In this paper, I will analyze and critically evaluate 20th century American philosopher Robert Nozick’s position regarding utilitarianism; how he refutes utilitarianism with reference to two new concepts called “Experience Machine” and “Utility Monster”. I will argue that if we were given the option of entering into an experience machine as Nozick presented in his book Anarchy State and Utopia, in which we can create a new better life for ourselves, then it would be irrational to refuse the option. I will then reply to Nozick’s objection regarding utilitarianism within his concept of utility monster, where he argued that accepting the theory of utilitarianism causes the necessary acceptance of a utility monster, that is, the condition that some people would use this doctrine to justify the exploitation of others. I will argue here that giving “happy units” to weak utility monsters can bring about wonderful result. All my arguments are formed within utilitarian consequentialist framework. Philosophy and Progress, Vol#61-62; No#1-2; Jan-Dec 2017 P 165-176

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom