z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Expression of Kl67 In ER+ PR+ HER2- & ERr- PRr- HER2- Breast Cancer Patients
Author(s) -
Md Hasanuzzaman,
Johirul Lslam,
Altaf Hossain,
Rassell,
Mohammad Zillur Rahman,
Mohammad Zillur Rahman,
Ashraf Ul Haque
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of surgical sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2408-8668
pISSN - 1728-2152
DOI - 10.3329/jss.v20i2.43812
Subject(s) - medicine , breast cancer , immunohistochemistry , breast carcinoma , cancer , oncology , gynecology , gastroenterology
Background: Carcinoma of the breast is one of the most common malignancies in women worldwide. Objective: The current study was conducted to evaluate the role of Ki-67 as a prognosticmarker in two definite groups of breast cancer patients (ER+ve, PR+ve, HER-ve& triple negative)in Bangladesh perspective. Methods: Sixty nine female breast cancer patients operated at the surgical oncology departmentof National Institute of Cancer Research & Hospital were selected by non-probabilitysampling method and operated specimens were sent for immunohistochemical study of theER, PR, Her2/neu receptors and Ki-67 protein analysis. Statistical analysis was conductedusing SPSS version 17 for Windows software. P-value 0.05 or less was considered as significant. Result: The mean age of the patients was 46.96 years with SD of± 13.13 years. Histopathologyreports revealed that 94.2% (65/69) were suffering from duct cell carcinoma (DCC) whilelobular varieties were found in 2 cases. Majority of the patients with ER+, PR+ and Ki-67 +vestatus were between 36-50 years of age. But for Her2/neu positive cases most of patientswere above 50 years of age. In Luminal A category cancer patients 69.7% showed positiveKi-67 expression but in case of triple negative cases this percentage was 87.5%. However, thisdifference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Scores based upon staining of ER, PR, Her2/neu and Ki-67 collectively known asIHC4 which can be used as prognostic markers in breast cancer patients. Journal of Surgical Sciences (2016) Vol. 20 (2) :37-41

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here