z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Heavy Metals Phytoremidiation Potential of Napier Grass Cultivated on Tannery Sludge in Bangladesh
Author(s) -
Md Ariful Islam Juel,
Thuhin Kumar Dey,
Md Ibrahim Sardar Akash,
Kushol Kumar Das
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of engineering science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2706-6835
pISSN - 2075-4914
DOI - 10.3329/jes.v12i1.53099
Subject(s) - pennisetum purpureum , phytoremediation , brassica , heavy metals , bioconcentration , agronomy , chromium , cadmium , zinc , chemistry , horticulture , bioaccumulation , biology , environmental chemistry , dry matter , organic chemistry
Phytoremediation is a cost effective and eco-friendly method for cleanup of contaminated soil. This study focused on the assessment of phytoremediation potential of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) and Indian mastered (Brassica juncea) yielding in tannery sludge. Initial characterization of tannery sludge showed a high concentration of chromium, lead, copper and zinc which were 6845.5±50.2, 73±2.5, 93±1.5 and 29±2.5 mg/kg, respectively. Both seeds of these plants were sown on tannery sludge kept in baskets and harvested after 8 and 12 weeks of plantation. Analysis indicated that both Napier grass and Indian mustard accumulated heavy metals in the order of Cr>Zn>Cu>Pb at different parts of these plants. Transfer factor (TF) for both plants were greater than 1 for Cu, Zn, Pb though it was less than 1 for Cr. Indian mustard accumulated highest concentration of Cr, Cu, and Pb whereas Napier grass showed highest Zn uptake and good Cr and Cu accumulation capacity. The uptake rate of Cr increased in Napier grass with the increase of plant age. Moreover, Napier grass is one of the rapid yielding tropical grasses and can retain for a longer period than Indian mustard for that attribute, it may accumulate more heavy metals than Indian mustard within its life span. Both of these plants can be used for remediating heavy metals from contaminated tannery sludge. Journal of Engineering Science 12(1), 2021, 35-41

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here