z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Dietary inclusion of neem leaf powder on growth performance, blood biochemical parameters and profitability of broilers
Author(s) -
Mostafa Ali Reza Hossain,
MT Siddiqua,
MM Hossain
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
animal science journal of pakistan
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2408-8307
pISSN - 0003-3588
DOI - 10.3329/bjas.v50i2.58140
Subject(s) - broiler , basal (medicine) , triglyceride , zoology , feed conversion ratio , body weight , antibiotics , medicine , weight gain , cholesterol , biology , biochemistry , insulin
The experiment was carried out to investigate the effects of neem (Azadirachta indica) leaf powder (NLP) over a period of 35 days on the growth performance, dressing parameters, serum biochemical parameters and profitability of broiler meat. Day old broiler chicks (n = 320) were randomly assigned to five dietary groups, each with four replicates. The dietary treatment groups were; control (basal diet; no additives), antibiotic (basal diet + antibiotic), NLP 0.25% (basal diet + 0.25% NLP), NLP 0.375% (basal diet + 0.375% NLP) and NLP 0.50% (basal diet + 0.50% NLP). Results showed that the body weight, body weight gain, feed intake and FCR were differed significantly (P 0.05). Better (P 0.05) different among the dietary groups. Serum glucose, triglyceride, GOT, GPT and cholesterol level were non-significant (P>0.05) among the dietary groups. However, HDL was significantly (P<0.05) higher in NLP 0.25% group compared to the control group. Higher profitability was found in NLP-0.25% group and antibiotic group when all the birds were sold at market price. It can be concluded that the addition of NLP to broiler diet had a positive effect on growth performances but no negative effect on dressing parameters and serum biochemical parameters. Moreover, NLP at the level of 0.25% increases HDL level and improve profitability. It can be suggested that neem leaf powder up to 0.375% could be potential feed additive in broiler diet. Bang. J. Anim. Sci. 2021. 50 (2): 114-122  

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here