z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Vitamin D status in Bangladeshi subjects: a laboratory based study
Author(s) -
Akm Monwarul Islam,
Nayeemul Hasan,
Kazi Mizanur Rahman,
Md. Asaduzzaman,
Muhammad Abdur Rahim,
Shahana Zaman,
Rashedul Islam,
Humayra Jesmin,
Lovely Yeasmin
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
birdem medical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2305-3720
pISSN - 2305-3712
DOI - 10.3329/birdem.v9i3.43081
Subject(s) - hypovitaminosis , medicine , vitamin d and neurology , vitamin , vitamin d deficiency , physiology , gastroenterology , pediatrics
Background: Vitamin D plays important role in normal functioning of multiple organs of the body. Hypovitaminosis D is known to be prevalent worldwide including the tropical countries. The present study was carried out to evaluate the vitamin D status in Bangladeshi patients undergoing laboratory investigation for vitamin D. Methods: This was a laboratory-based study. Data were extracted from the database of a diagnostic centre of Dhaka city and were analysed. Vitamin D status was defined as follows: deficiency 0 to 100 ng/ml. Results: A total of 793 plasma vitamin D level reports were analysed. Out of 793 subjects, 269 (33.9%) were male and 524 (66.1%) were female. Majority (62.0%) were between 21 and 60 years of age. Mean (+/- standard deviation) vitamin D level of the study subjects was 21.66 (+/- 18.63) ng/ml. Eighty-six percent had hypovitaminosis D; 61.4% had deficiency and 24.1% had insufficiency. Vitamin D level was found sufficient in 13.1% subjects. Among the deficient subjects, 31.6% were male and 68.4% were female; among the insufficient subjects, 35.1% were male and 64.9% were female. Sixty-eight percent of the deficient subjects belonged to the 21 to 60 year age group, whereas 57.1% of the insufficient subjects were between 21 and 60 years. Conclusion: Hypovitaminosis D is common among the real-world clinical subjects undergoing vitamin D estimation in Bangladesh. Middle-aged females are more likely to be affected Birdem Med J 2019; 9(3): 202-206

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here