
Cruel Insensibility and an Ethics Without Authority
Author(s) -
Amanda Boetzkes
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
stasis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.1
H-Index - 4
eISSN - 2500-0721
pISSN - 2310-3817
DOI - 10.33280/2310-3817-21-11-1-39-52
Subject(s) - cruelty , environmental ethics , witness , phenomenon , anthropocene , history , sociology , criminology , political science , philosophy , law , epistemology
This article considers the phenomenon of being insensible to animal cruelty, and how such insensibility relates to human transgressions of the planet. I consider the visualization of animal culls that appeared upon the emergence of the coronavirus pandemic. The spectacular wasting of animal life, I argue, discloses the economic logic by which humanity secures itself as a sovereign species. Such a logic and its visuality are not only underpinned by a broader necropolitical paradigm, moreover, they co-constitute a primal scene that enables the liquidation of animal life to the point of extinction. Following the evolutionary biologist Rob Wallace, I consider animal culls in relation to the phenomenon of virus dumping, a systemic perturbation of forest ecologies preceded by the influx of capital in agricultural markets that results in the release and rapid evolution of viruses. I therefore recapitulate the relationship between animal cruelty and the economy of planet wasting that subtends it. In this vein, I consider how the visuality of animal cruelty is predicated on a banal violence. Yet, drawing from Hannah Arendt, I call for an ethics without authority, a version of the Sensus Communis by which we might witness cruelty from within the depths of planetary transgressions.