Open AccessInnovations in research and clinical care using patient‐generated health data
Author(s) -
Jim Heather S. L.,
Hoogland Aasha I.,
Brownstein Naomi C.,
Barata Anna,
Dicker Adam P.,
Knoop Hans,
Gonzalez Brian D.,
Perkins Randa,
Rollison Dana,
Gilbert Scott M.,
Nanda Ronica,
Berglund Anders,
Mitchell Ross,
Johnstone Peter A. S.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
ca: a cancer journal for clinicians
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 62.937
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1542-4863
pISSN - 0007-9235
DOI - 10.3322/caac.21608
Subject(s) - workflow , data science , context (archaeology) , biometric data , biometrics , big data , health care , quality (philosophy) , computer science , medicine , artificial intelligence , data mining , geography , philosophy , archaeology , epistemology , database , economic growth , economics
Patient‐generated health data (PGHD), or health‐related data gathered from patients to help address a health concern, are used increasingly in oncology to make regulatory decisions and evaluate quality of care. PGHD include self‐reported health and treatment histories, patient‐reported outcomes (PROs), and biometric sensor data. Advances in wireless technology, smartphones, and the Internet of Things have facilitated new ways to collect PGHD during clinic visits and in daily life. The goal of the current review was to provide an overview of the current clinical, regulatory, technological, and analytic landscape as it relates to PGHD in oncology research and care. The review begins with a rationale for PGHD as described by the US Food and Drug Administration, the Institute of Medicine, and other regulatory and scientific organizations. The evidence base for clinic‐based and remote symptom monitoring using PGHD is described, with an emphasis on PROs. An overview is presented of current approaches to digital phenotyping or device‐based, real‐time assessment of biometric, behavioral, self‐report, and performance data. Analytic opportunities regarding PGHD are envisioned in the context of big data and artificial intelligence in medicine. Finally, challenges and solutions for the integration of PGHD into clinical care are presented. The challenges include electronic medical record integration of PROs and biometric data, analysis of large and complex biometric data sets, and potential clinic workflow redesign. In addition, there is currently more limited evidence for the use of biometric data relative to PROs. Despite these challenges, the potential benefits of PGHD make them increasingly likely to be integrated into oncology research and clinical care.