
Islam, Catholicism, and Religion-State Separation: An Essential or Historical Difference?
Author(s) -
Ahmet T. Kuru
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
international journal of religion
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2633-3538
pISSN - 2633-352X
DOI - 10.33182/ijor.v1i1.982
Subject(s) - islam , alliance , dissent , christianity , state (computer science) , politics , eleventh , political science , muslim world , sociology , religious studies , social science , law , philosophy , theology , physics , algorithm , computer science , acoustics
There exist severe restrictions over religious dissent in most Muslim-majority countries. This problem is associated with the alliance between religious and political authorities in these cases. I argue that the alliance between Islamic scholars (the ulema) and the state authorities was historically constructed, instead of being a characteristic of Islam. Hence, the essentialist idea that Islam inherently rejects religion-state separation, whereas Christianity endorses it, is misleading. Instead, this article shows that the ulema-state alliance in the Muslim world was constructed after the mid-eleventh century, as well as revealing that the church-state separation in Western Europe was also historically institutionalized during that period. Using comparative-historical methods, the article explains the political and socioeconomic backgrounds of these epochal transformations. It particularly focuses on the relations between religious, political, intellectual, and economic classes.