z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Islam, Catholicism, and Religion-State Separation: An Essential or Historical Difference?
Author(s) -
Ahmet T. Kuru
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
international journal of religion
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2633-3538
pISSN - 2633-352X
DOI - 10.33182/ijor.v1i1.982
Subject(s) - islam , alliance , dissent , christianity , state (computer science) , politics , eleventh , political science , muslim world , sociology , religious studies , social science , law , philosophy , theology , physics , algorithm , computer science , acoustics
There exist severe restrictions over religious dissent in most Muslim-majority countries. This problem is associated with the alliance between religious and political authorities in these cases. I argue that the alliance between Islamic scholars (the ulema) and the state authorities was historically constructed, instead of being a characteristic of Islam. Hence, the essentialist idea that Islam inherently rejects religion-state separation, whereas Christianity endorses it, is misleading. Instead, this article shows that the ulema-state alliance in the Muslim world was constructed after the mid-eleventh century, as well as revealing that the church-state separation in Western Europe was also historically institutionalized during that period. Using comparative-historical methods, the article explains the political and socioeconomic backgrounds of these epochal transformations. It particularly focuses on the relations between religious, political, intellectual, and economic classes.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here