
SLOVENSKO VOJAŠKO ŠOLSTVO, ZAMUJENE PRILOŽNOSTI IN IZZIVI V PRIHODNOSTI
Author(s) -
DUŠAN TOŠ
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
sodobni vojaški izzivi
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2463-9575
pISSN - 2232-2825
DOI - 10.33179/bsv.99.svi.11.cmc.13.2.6
Subject(s) - physics , humanities , philosophy
Dvajset let v razvoju vojaške organizacije ne pomeni veliko, če ne vidimo napredka, če smo do doseženega preveč kritični in nič ni dovolj dobro. Zelo bi bilo tudi narobe, če bi se naslonili v udobne naslanjače in bili zadovoljni z doseženim. Pogled nazaj mora biti kritičen. Pred leti sem v članku napisal: »Veliko je pomislekov o ustre- znosti vojaških šol, pa tudi o ustreznosti sistema vojaškega izobraževanja in uspo- sabljanja /.../ Napačne pa so ocene, da imamo slabo vojaško šolstvo, da je sistem, v katerem učimo in usposabljamo kader, slab. Moja ugotovitev je, da imamo točno takšne šole, kot jih zmoremo oblikovati. Za obdobje, v katerem smo delovali, je sistem tudi povsem zadoščal. Danes želimo več, boljše, drugačno.« Tudi takrat sem v prispevku podal svoj kritični pogled na narejeno in ponujal druge rešitve za doseganje po mojem mnenju bistvenega cilja in ključne stopnje v razvoju – zagoto- viti boljšo komplementarnost javnega in internega sistema vojaškega izobraževanja in usposabljanja. Twenty years in the development of a military organization does not mean much if we are completely satisfied with the progress, if we do not see any progress, if we are too critical of the progress and if we find nothing good enough. It would also be wrong to relax in a comfortable armchair and claim satisfaction with the progress made. One should be critical when looking back. Several years ago, I wrote in one of my articles: »Many question the suitability of military schools as well as the military education and training system... However, the assessments, that our military schools and the system in which we educate and train our personnel are poor, are incorrect. It is in my opinion that we have exactly those types of schools that we are able to shape. This system was completely sufficient for the period in which we operated in. Today people want something more, better, and different.« At that time, I also made a critical view of the achievements and offered other solutions to attain what I consider a vital objective and key stage in the development - to provide for a better level of complementarity of the public and internal systems of education and training.