z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Criticism of Inaccuracies and Ordering of the Periodic Table of Elements
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
petroleum and chemical industry international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2639-7536
DOI - 10.33140/pcii.04.02.04
Subject(s) - lutetium , nucleus , neutron , hafnium , atomic number , atomic mass , atomic nucleus , mass number , table (database) , atomic physics , proton , periodic table , physics , nucleon , nuclear physics , chemistry , zirconium , inorganic chemistry , quantum mechanics , organic chemistry , computer science , data mining , yttrium , biology , microbiology and biotechnology , oxide
The atomic nucleus model was developed to clarify the revised table of elements. Between lutetium and hafnium, the difference in atomic masses does not reach four units, while new elements with atomic numbers 72-75 are located there. How can nucleons be packed in a nucleus so that it is droplet and shell and with the required number of neutrons? Such a nucleus is obtained if alpha particles are placed in the surface layer, and only neutrons are inside the nucleus. In this case, for new chemical elements with numbers 72-75 inside the nucleus, the neutron can be replaced by a proton, and therefore the atomic mass of the elements between lutetium and hafnium will change insignificantly. The model was obtained by considering the structures of atomic nuclei from heavy to light.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here