Open AccessThe Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning in Undergraduate Nursing Programs: A Scoping Review of the Literature
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of nursing and healthcare
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2475-529X
DOI - 10.33140/jnh.04.01.01
Subject(s) - cinahl , critical appraisal , competence (human resources) , systematic review , medline , context (archaeology) , nursing , inclusion (mineral) , medical education , psychology , grey literature , population , evidence based practice , medicine , alternative medicine , social psychology , psychological intervention , political science , paleontology , pathology , law , biology , environmental health
Problem-based learning (PBL) working as an innovative student-centered teaching method has been tested forits effectiveness among considerable primary studies. While there is still lacking firm evidence in the nursing educational fieldabout its efficacy. The different paper reports different research result about an application of PBL methodology.Objectives: The purpose of this scoping review was to appraise and examine the range of recent available evidence on theeffectiveness of problem-based learning in undergraduate nursing programs.Research Strategy: Used Medline, The Cochrane Databases of Systematic Review, and The Database of Abstract of Reviews ofEffect (DARE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL (via Ebsco)) to search English languageliterature. Adopted P (population) C (concept) C (context) framework to identify keywords and index terms, and the referencelist of some high level of evidence was lastly searched for additional studies.Methodological quality: Each paper was assessed for its eligibility and methodological quality with JBI Critical Appraisal tools(Appendix 1) before inclusion in this review. The level of evidence of each retrieved study was assessed according to New JBILevels of Evidence (Appendix2) developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute Levels of Evidence and Grades of RecommendationWorking Party October 2013. High level of evidence such as systematic reviews, randomised control trials, quasi-experimentalstudies were given priority.Discussion: Considerable primary studies have reported PBL produced a positive outcome for nursing students, while noneof them gave firm evidence about the effect of PBL on nursing students’ critical thinking development, knowledge competence,learning motivation, attitude, and performance. Critical thinking, as the vital evaluation element of each study, whether relatespositively to the other skills was uncertain. The validity and reliability of evaluation instruments in each study in nursingdiscipline were still controversial.Conclusion: No strong conclusion had been made from this review, and more research with large sample size is needed toexamine the effectiveness of PBL among nursing programs. Long-term effects of outcomes and cost effectiveness were suggestedto be measured in future studies. The effectiveness’ appraisal instruments in nursing discipline were called for adjustmentand development.