Open Access"The IR is a Nice Thing But...": Attitudes and Perceptions of the Institutional Repository
Author(s) -
Nicole Doro
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
canadian journal of academic librarianship
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2369-937X
DOI - 10.33137/cjal-rcbu.v7.32145
Subject(s) - promotion (chess) , perception , medical education , public relations , scholarly communication , work (physics) , nice , resistance (ecology) , psychology , political science , medicine , engineering , computer science , publishing , mechanical engineering , ecology , neuroscience , politics , law , biology , programming language
What attitudes and perceptions do faculty members, graduate students, and other stakeholders have regarding the institutional repository (IR)? I conducted a study at the University of Western Ontario through a survey of 316 participants from various faculties and in roles ranging from graduate students to tenured faculty members, followed by interviews with 10 faculty members and 3 librarians to discuss aggregate results from the survey. Results suggest a course of action for librarians who work with IRs, based on participants’ perceptions of barriers to use (branding, data ownership, resistance to open access (OA), alternative avenues for self-archiving) and elements of the IR participants enjoy and find motivating for use (continued access for graduates, dissertations and theses, pre-print literature reviews, satisfying OA mandates). Suggested next steps to promote IR uptake cover a number of different areas: mediated deposit; clarify benefits for faculty members; communication between library and users; opt-in features; tenure and promotion; enforcing OA mandates; and collaboration.